top of page

Ethnicity And Custodial Sentencing

Updated: Feb 3, 2023

Julian V. Roberts and Jonathan Bild


Are sentencing outcomes different for ethnic minority defendants? Which ethnic groups attract the harshest sentences? Over the past 30 years a number of official reports have addressed the role of race and ethnicity in criminal justice decision-making. Although several studies have focused on sentencing, to date, no review or synthesis of these studies has been conducted.


Many questions remain unanswered. This report explores sentencing patterns for different offender profiles. The focus is upon trends emerging from court statistics over the period 2009-2019.


Two key issues emerge: ethnic disproportionality in criminal justice statistics and differential sentencing outcomes. Disproportionality is expressed by comparing the percentage of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) individuals appearing at stages of the criminal justice system (e.g. arrest; charge; custodial admissions) to their proportion in the general population.


Differential sentencing compares the outcomes for categories of offender. This report concentrates on sentencing outcomes, and more specifically, on custody rates and prison sentence lengths.


Read the full report here.



Comments


The Sentencing Academy is funded by the Dawes Trust.

Collaborate with us

We are keen to work in partnership, being led by the data to inform change. Contact us if there is an area of sentencing or funding that we can work together on. We look forward to hearing from you.

Links

Registered charity no: 1183958

Contact

info@sentencingacademy.org.uk

Bentham House
4-8 Endsleigh Gardens
London
WC1H OEG

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

© The Sentencing Academy 2023. Website by Digital Edge.

Living Wage Foundation.png
CCS_2935_Supplier_AW.png

Subscribe to our newsletter

bottom of page